Government CapacityProposedMedium TermFinance Standing Committee

Inclusive Growth Spending Review — Reprioritising Social Grants vs. Employment

Theme: Fiscal policy / social expenditure

First raisedMay 2023Last discussedAug 20266 meetings on the record ↓

Generate Brief Compare Feasibility Matrix

Assessment

Growth Impact4/5

Feasibility2/5

Responsible: National Treasury / Department of Social Development / DPSA / DSBD

Feasibility Assessment

Q4 2025 QLFS: official unemployment rate 31.4% (narrow definition, unchanged from Q3 2025); youth unemployment (15–34) at 58.5%; expanded unemployment rate (including discouraged workers) approximately 42.5%. Labour force participation rate: 56.3%. The end of load-shedding has supported services sector employment recovery, but manufacturing employment continues to contract — partly reflecting the automotive export shock (US tariffs), CTFL import competition, and ongoing capital deepening in mining. The SRD grant (R370/month) covers approximately 9.3 million beneficiaries and represents a de facto basic income floor, but is not linked to work-seeking or skills development activities. The Inclusive Growth Spending Review should prioritise: expansion of the Employment Tax Incentive (ETI) for youth workers, the Jobs Fund's fourth investment round, EPWP reform toward skills-pathway integration, and SMME employer de-registration cost reduction.

Stakeholder Landscape

Who backs this reform, who needs convincing, and which interests or red lines shape political feasibility.

Reviewer

Open review workspace

Backers

1 stakeholders

Negotiation weight

0 conditional actors

Opposition weight

1 opposing actors

Review coverage

0/2

All mapped stance notes are still draft

Provenance warning

Every mapped stakeholder stance for this idea is still draft. The coalition score is directional only until at least the high-influence actors are reviewed.

Coalition Read

50/100Fragile

Anchor: National Treasury. Most serious blocker: COSATU.

Political Tractability

—Needs reviewed signals

No reviewed signals · 0% of mapped influence has been reviewed.

Backers1 stakeholder

National TreasuryCoalition anchordraftInfluence 9/10

Idea 26 is a Budget-proposed, MTEF-commissioned, fiscally neutral spending review — Treasury's own instrument; the note's political-feasibility caution is not among the brief's conditions, so support is better grounded than conditional.

Interest: Fiscal consolidation with public debt stabilising below 75% of GDP; structural reforms that improve revenue without expanding contingent liabilities;…

Concern: Unfunded mandates in energy transition (JETP co-financing); Eskom's R400bn+ debt and how restructuring socialises costs; reform proposals that create…

Engagement path: Reforms must be fiscally neutral or revenue-positive over the MTEF window; SOE restructuring must demonstrably reduce contingent liabilities; credible…

Opposition to Manage1 stakeholder

COSATUHigh-risk blockerdraftInfluence 9/10

COSATU opposes redirecting social grants toward employment programmes, viewing grants as a constitutional safety net.

Interest: Worker protections under the Labour Relations Act and Basic Conditions of Employment Act; collective bargaining rights; equitable wage growth; just tr…

Concern: Labour market flexibility reforms that erode LRA and BCEA protections; Eskom unbundling without adequate just transition planning for NUM members; pri…

Engagement path: Meaningful social dialogue through NEDLAC before structural reforms are finalised; just transition funding ring-fenced in MTEF; skills retraining and…

Description

South Africa spends approximately R280 billion annually on social grants (2025/26), including the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant (R110 per day for 9 million recipients), child support grants (R530 per month for 13 million children), old age pensions, and disability grants. The fiscal cost of the SRD grant alone—introduced as a COVID-19 measure in 2020 and retained due to mass unemployment—is R35 billion per year. The Inclusive Growth Spending Review, proposed in the 2024 Budget and commissioned within the Medium-Term Expenditure Framework process, evaluates whether the social protection budget is optimally structured to simultaneously reduce poverty (short-term) and unemployment (long-term). Specifically: could a portion of the SRD grant budget be redirected to employment programmes (EPWP, Jobs Fund) without leaving vulnerable people worse off? The evidence from international social protection research suggests that conditionality (linking grants to training or job search) works in countries with functioning labour markets but has negligible effects in high-unemployment contexts. The textbook (Chapter 8) notes that South Africa's grant system is fiscally large, well-targeted, and poverty-reducing but has no direct channel to labour market activation. The MTBPS 2025 commits to resolving the SRD grant's legal status by 2026/27.

OECD

Referenced in OECD Economic Surveys: South Africa

OECD SA Survey (2017, 2020, 2022, 2025). Building an inclusive social protection system is a key recommendation in the 2020 survey.

Grants keep people alive — employment programmes give them a future. Both matter, but the balance has shifted too far from investment toward consumption. — PEAC Policy Note 2024

Implementation Roadmap

National Treasury, working through the MTEF process, will commission a comprehensive Inclusive Growth Spending Review evaluating whether the R280 billion social protection budget is optimally structured for both poverty reduction and employment activation. The review will model trade-offs between the SRD grant, EPWP, and the Jobs Fund. DPME will lead programme evaluation using administrative data from SASSA and the UIF. The SRD grant's legal status will be resolved by 2026/27 MTBPS as committed. Success is measured by a published spending review with evidence-based policy recommendations adopted in the 2027 Budget.

National Treasury and DPME commission the Inclusive Growth Spending Review: define scope (social grants, EPWP, Jobs Fund, youth employment interventions), appoint technical review team, establish data access protocols with SASSA and UIF

Q1-Q2 2025National Treasury / Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME)

SASSA and DSD publish consolidated administrative data on SRD grant recipient characteristics, labour market status, and grant utilisation patterns; link to SARS taxpayer register for income verification and Jobs Fund outcome data

Q2-Q3 2025South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) / Department of Social Development (DSD) / SARS

Spending Review technical report: model three scenarios for social protection budget reorientation (maintain status quo, partial employment activation, full basic income grant); publish for stakeholder consultation

International Comparisons

View all →

🇧🇷Brazil2003

Brazil's Bolsa Família (2003) reached 14 million families (50 million people) at peak, transferring BRL 190/month conditional on children attending school and health check-ups. Poverty fell from 22% to 7% between 2003 and 2014; 29 million people exited extreme poverty. Payments were made via Caixa Econômica Federal bank cards, bringing 10 million unbanked families into the formal financial system. SA's 18-million-recipient social grants system uses a similar architecture; Bolsa Família demonstrates the power of conditionality and financial inclusion linkages within grant programmes.

Approach

Bolsa Família merged four overlapping federal transfers into one benefit paid on a single card, and built the Cadastro Único — a national registry of low-income households maintained by municipalities and used by every social programme thereafter. Conditions attached to the payment, school attendance and child health checks, were monitored by the education and health ministries and enforced through graduated warnings and suspension rather than removal. Municipalities were paid a management fee scaled to the quality of their registry data, which is what kept the register current. Payment went to the mother by default.

Timeline: Programme consolidation within a year of the 2003 launch; registry coverage and conditionality monitoring matured over about five years

Lessons for South Africa

The spending review's question — whether SRD money can buy employment outcomes — runs straight into what the evidence supports and Brazil illustrates: conditionality works on services that exist and can be attended, which is why Bolsa Família conditioned on school and clinic rather than on job search. At SA's unemployment rate an activation condition on the SRD would mostly ration the grant. The transferable piece is administrative: the Cadastro Único is a single registry serving every programme, whereas SASSA, the SRD database and EPWP recruit from separate lists — which is precisely what makes a credible review comparing social grant and employment spending impossible to conduct.

Evidence & Research

Research corpus →

COVID-19, social protection, and the labour market in South Africa: Are social grants being targeted at the most vulnerable?
DPRU (UCT) · Jan 2020
The paper evaluates whether social grants are effectively targeted at the most vulnerable and analyses labour market outcomes during the pandemic, directly informing the spending review's core question of whether social protection budgets are optimally structured to address both poverty and unemplo…
Social Assistance Amidst the Covid-19 Epidemic in South Africa: An Impact Assessment
DPRU (UCT) · Jan 2020
The paper directly evaluates the trade-off between expanding the Covid grant (precursor to the SRD grant) versus increasing the Child Support Grant, assessing coverage, cost, and welfare effects—the core comparison the Spending Review must make when deciding whether to redirect SRD budget to employ…
Social assistance during South Africa's national lockdown: Examining the COVID-19 grant, changes to the Child Support Grant, and post-October policy options
DPRU (UCT) · Jan 2020
The paper directly analyses the COVID-19 grant (predecessor to the SRD grant), examines its costs and welfare effects, and evaluates alternative post-October policy options including comparisons to public works programmes—the core trade-off the Spending Review examines between social grants and emp…

Links proposed by lexical matching and screened by a calibrated research judge. Follow the paper for the full argument and its caveats.

Parliamentary record

6 meetings

Committee sittings this reform was drawn from, most recent first. Each row opens the meeting on this site; the PMG link goes to the source record.

Status History

tracked since Mar 2026

Recorded as Proposed when status tracking began — held since at least Mar 2026.
Mar 2026

Data as of 2026-08-24 · latest PMG meeting 2026-08-21