Skip to main content
SA Policy Space

Municipal Fiscal Powers and Functions Amendment Bill

Government CapacityUnder reviewMedium TermRaised 3× in committeeFinance Select Committee (NCOP)

Theme: Local government finance

First raisedMar 2022Last discussedDec 2022No committee discussion in 12+ months3 meetings on the record ↓
Generate BriefCompareFeasibility Matrix

Reform at a glance

What changes
Municipal Fiscal Powers and Functions Amendment Bill
Responsible actor (recorded)
National Treasury / COGTA / SALGA
Recorded status
Under review — editorial assessment.
Milestone described by this status
Status scope has not yet been independently documented; it may cover only part of this reform.
Next documented milestone
Next milestone not yet documented
Compare shortlist (0/3)
Back to ideas
On this page

Description

The Municipal Fiscal Powers and Functions Amendment Bill (MFPFA), tabled in Parliament in 2024 and endorsed by both the National Treasury and the PC on Finance BRRRs, proposes to standardise the regulation of development charges—fees levied by municipalities on new property developments to recover the cost of bulk infrastructure connections (water, sewer, roads, electricity). Currently, development charge methodology varies enormously across municipalities: some municipalities charge developers nothing and cross-subsidise from rates; others levy charges that bear no relationship to actual infrastructure cost. The Bill introduces a national framework for development charge calculation (based on actual bulk infrastructure cost per connection), removes discretionary waiver powers that have been captured by politically connected developers, and requires municipalities to maintain a development charge reserve fund for bulk infrastructure investment. The PC on Finance BRRRs 2020–2023 repeatedly flag under-charging of development charges as a major cause of municipal infrastructure deficits—well-located urban land development subsidised by the rates base undermines municipal financial sustainability.

Assessment

Growth Impact3/5
Feasibility3/5

Responsible: National Treasury / COGTA / SALGA

Feasibility Assessment

Medium: Bill drafted; Parliamentary cycle required. Politically contested between metros (revenue maximisation) and National Treasury (fiscal discipline). Fiscally important but slow-moving.

Stakeholder Landscape

Who backs this reform, who needs convincing, and which interests or red lines shape political feasibility.

Backers

9

1 stakeholder

Negotiation weight

0

0 conditional actors

Opposition weight

0

0 opposing actors

Coalition Read

AI-drafted stances · 0 reviewed

1 of 38 actors mapped — not scored

A coalition score needs at least 3 mapped stances, or actors carrying 25% of the map's influence. The stances below are the evidence; the average over this few of them would not be.

Anchor: National Treasury.

Political Tractability

—Needs reviewed signals

No reviewed signals · 0% of mapped influence has been reviewed.

Backers1 stakeholder
National TreasuryCoalition anchorInfluence 9/10

Municipal fiscal powers reform is a Treasury priority for improving local government revenue and infrastructure investment capacity.

Interest: Fiscal consolidation with public debt stabilising below 75% of GDP; structural reforms that improve revenue without expanding contingent liabilities;…

Concern: Unfunded mandates in energy transition (JETP co-financing); Eskom's R400bn+ debt and how restructuring socialises costs; reform proposals that create…

Engagement path: Reforms must be fiscally neutral or revenue-positive over the MTEF window; SOE restructuring must demonstrably reduce contingent liabilities; credible…

OECD

Referenced in OECD Economic Surveys: South Africa

OECD SA Survey (2017, 2020, 2022, 2025). Fiscal consolidation and debt stabilisation recommended across all surveys; the 2025 survey calls for a formal fiscal rule.

Municipal fiscal sustainability cannot be achieved by grant dependence alone — own-revenue capacity must be built or the system will continue to collapse. — FFC Submission to PC on COGTA, 2024

Implementation Roadmap

National Treasury, SALGA, and COGTA will drive the Municipal Fiscal Powers and Functions Amendment Bill (MFPFA) through Parliament and operationalise a national development charge methodology standardising how municipalities levy fees on new property developments. The Bill removes discretionary waiver powers captured by politically connected developers and introduces mandatory bulk infrastructure reserve funds. SALGA will provide technical assistance to all 8 metros and 44 secondary cities for development charge model calibration and bylaw alignment. The AGSA will incorporate development charge compliance into its municipal audit framework. Success is measured by all metros adopting MFPFA-compliant methodologies within 12 months of enactment.

1

Parliamentary process: finalise MFPFA Bill through NCOP (Section 76 bill affecting local government financial competence); address SALGA and municipal stakeholder submissions; Presidential assent targeted for Q2 2025

Q1-Q2 2025National Treasury / Parliament (NCOP) / SALGA
2

National Treasury publish Development Charge Methodology Regulations under the enacted MFPFA: standardised infrastructure cost allocation model, mandatory reserve fund requirements, and transition timeline for existing municipality bylaws

Q3 2025 (within 90 days of enactment)National Treasury / COGTA
3

SALGA technical assistance programme: deploy urban finance advisors to the 8 metros and 44 secondary cities to recalibrate development charge bylaws, establish reserve funds, and train municipal finance officials; costing support through NT Local Government Budget Forum

Q3 2025-Q2 2026SALGA / National Treasury / COGTA
4

AGSA incorporate development charge compliance into annual municipal audit: track reserve fund establishment, bylaw alignment, and waiver abolition; report to PC on COGTA and the Financial and Fiscal Commission

Annual (from 2025/26 audit cycle)Auditor-General of SA (AGSA) / Financial and Fiscal Commission (FFC)
Timeline

MFPFA enactment: Q2 2025; regulations: Q3 2025; municipal bylaw compliance: Q3 2026; AGSA audit integration: 2025/26 cycle

Estimated Cost

National Treasury technical assistance: R50 million (existing LGTAS budget); SALGA programme: R30 million; municipalities fund reserve accounts from development charges (self-financing)

Required Legislation

Municipal Fiscal Powers and Functions Amendment Bill (tabled 2024, Section 76 - requires NCOP concurrence); no changes to Municipal Systems Act or MFMA required at this stage

Political Feasibility

Strong National Treasury and SALGA alignment. Some large municipalities (Johannesburg, Tshwane) resist curtailing waiver discretion. Property developers (SAPOA) support standardised methodology as it increases planning certainty. DA and ANC both support the reform as fiscally sound. The primary political risk is municipal autonomy objections in NCOP.

International Precedents

Melbourne eliminated discretionary development contribution waivers in 2010 and introduced a standardised infrastructure contributions framework, generating AUD 2.5 billion in reserve fund accumulation within 5 years and reducing infrastructure maintenance backlogs by 35%. Singapore's Development Charge system - a transparent cost-based levy updated quarterly - is widely credited with enabling Singapore's infrastructure investment programme without fiscal stress.

Evidence & Research

Research corpus →
  • Advisory of National State of Service Delivery - October 2025

    NPC · Jan 2025

    The paper identifies municipal financial distress, infrastructure backlogs, and governance failures as core service delivery challenges, and proposes financial sustainability reforms including municipal financial recovery plans and revenue optimisation—directly bearing on the MFPFA's mechanism of s…

  • Joburg’s Broken Budget

    CDE · Aug 2026

    The paper documents Johannesburg's municipal fiscal crisis—including revenue collection failure, rising costs, and collapsing infrastructure investment—which directly bears on the problem the MFPFA addresses: the need for standardised municipal fiscal frameworks and sustainable infrastructure finan…

  • Johannesburg in Brief: Local Government White Paper

    CDE · Jul 2026

    The paper discusses the draft Local Government White Paper's proposal for a differentiated system allocating municipal powers according to capacity, and notes that existing regulations make it difficult for municipalities to work with businesses on infrastructure investment—directly bearing on the…

Links proposed by lexical matching and screened by a calibrated research judge. Follow the paper for the full argument and its caveats.

Policy documents

No linked official-document evidence yet. Coverage is incomplete.

Get the Monday briefing by email

— A short weekly digest of what moved in SA policy.

Status History

tracked since Mar 2026
  1. Recorded as Under review when status tracking began — held since at least Mar 2026.
    Mar 2026

Data as of 2026-10-10 · latest PMG meeting 2026-10-02