Research paper · working paper ·
Rowan Clarke; Chris Eaglin; Zach Kuloszewski; Jun Wong · ERSA
Rationing policies are frequently implemented due to equity concerns, yet whether equitable-exposure rules deliver equal economic impacts remains unclear. We study the 2021--2023 power crisis in South Africa, exploiting quasi-random variation in outage exposure and combining hour-level outage data with geocoded transactions from a leading payment platform. Although aggregate daily sales do not change on outage days, revenue is reallocated: below-median firms lose roughly eleven percent of daily revenue while above-median firms---able to invest in defensive technology---gain a similar share. These unequal effects are amplified when outages are anticipated, suggesting the impacts of rationing are not equal despite equitable exposure.
Abstract excerpted from the publisher page during the weekly research-corpus refresh. The full paper lives at the source.
Indexed in SA Policy Space from the publisher feed. The full paper, its citation, and any re-use rights live with ERSA.
Data as of 2026-06-15 · latest PMG meeting 2026-06-12