Research paper · working paper ·
DPRU (UCT)
Wage subsidies served as a dominant labour market policy response around the world to mitigate job losses in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, no causal evidence of their effects exists for developing countries. We use unique panel labour force survey data and exploit a temporary institutional eligibility detail to estimate the causal effects of such a policy – the Temporary Employer-Employee Relief Scheme (TERS) – on job retention among formal private sector employees in South Africa. Using a Difference-in-Differences design, within the context of an economy with one of the highest unemployment rates in the world, we find that the policy increased the probability of remaining employed in the short-term by 15.6 percentage points. Our findings imply that the policy saved 2.7 million jobs during April and May 2020, at a monthly cost of ZAR13 195 (US$1 851 PPP) per job saved. While this cost is large relative to the wage costs of jobs supported by the policy, it compares favourably to more developed country contexts. However, two-thirds of recipients were inframarginal and would have remained employed anyway in the policy’s absence, arguably due to prioritisation of rapid disbursement of relief over accurate targeting. We additionally examine heterogenous effects by subsidy intensity, and find that effects are positive but marginally regressively distributed across the subsidy distribution.
Abstract excerpted from the publisher page during the weekly research-corpus refresh. The full paper lives at the source.
Indexed in SA Policy Space from the publisher feed. The full paper, its citation, and any re-use rights live with DPRU (UCT).
Data as of 2026-06-15 · latest PMG meeting 2026-06-12